107–130.įor evaluating low-carbon campus, you think “management mechanism construction index” is _ than “low-carbon cultural construction index”Ī. Construction of evaluation system and indicators of ecological campus heavy weights. Comparative study on green campus evaluation system at home and abroad. A comprehensive analysis method on determining: The coefficients in multi-index evaluation. Daylighting for green schools: A resource for indoor quality and energy efficiency in educational environments. Pellegrino, Anna, Cammarano, Silvia, & Savio, Valeria. Global Environmental Change, 54, 184–194. Green schools in Taiwan: Effects on student sustainability consciousnesss. Construction Science and Technology, 8, 17–23. Research on low-carbon-oriented evaluation method on university campus of China. Construction Science and Technology, 12, 30–34. International comparison of the construction target and measurement of university green campus. Environmental Science and Management, 12, 182–185. Case study on construction of green university and assessment indexes. Green campus evaluation based on AHP: Fuzzy analysis model. Journal of Southeast University, 03, 398–401. Competitive situation analysis of regional logistics development based on AHP and entropy weight. Research on evaluate and construct low carbon campus park of our country. Sustainable Cities and Society, 11, 40–47. Thoughts of a design team: Barriers to low carbon school design. European Journal of Operation Research, 112(2), 397–404. Subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Green Campus Evaluation Standards (GB/T51356-2019). Preliminary study on evaluation of a low-carbon campus. By comparison, the result of the weight of index of low carbon campus was highly corresponding to the soring result of the campuses.īREEAM Fridén C-F. The validity and discrimination of the method in this paper can be verified by being employed on multiple universities in a municipality. The result of final comprehensive index weights was management mechanism construction weights 0.137, low-carbon culture construction weights 0.097, renewable energy use weights 0.040 and other emission reduction measures weights 0.123. Both original data and experts’ experience are integrated to quantify the index. Evaluation index system of low-carbon campuses is built that comprehensively considers both subjective and objective factors, which include management mechanism construction, low-carbon culture construction, renewable energy use and other emission reduction measures and propose quantitative evaluation methods by the analytic hierarchy process for subjective empowerment and the entropy weight method for objective empowerment. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a comprehensive low-carbon-oriented evaluation method. The low-carbon-oriented methods to evaluate college campuses are insufficient, and the indexes are not quantified effectively, which is a normal problem in the world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |